Due process
Test
Test an erroneous allegation, sensitive evidence, urgent restrictions, and a participant with limited resources.
Failure criterion
A design fails when a materially affected party lacks a practical route to reasons, challenge, and correction.
Questions testing this condition
- How should disputed technical evidence become a decision?
- Where would legitimate authority come from?
- Who resolves a dispute when powerful participants disagree?
- What rights would affected parties retain?
- What limits would apply during an emergency?
- How do withdrawal and functional defection work?
- How can decisions reach actors who never joined?
- Can infrastructure restrictions avoid cartel power?
- Who determines equivalence?
- What evidence would count against creating the institution?